Mailen Auroux vs Natalija Stevanovic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Auroux 1 - 0 Stevanovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Auroux winning 2 and Stevanovic winning 0. The last match between Auroux and Stevanovic was at the Podgorica, 17-09-2012, First, Clay with Mailen Auroux getting the victory 6-3 2-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mailen Auroux | 1 |
| Natalija Stevanovic | 0 |
Podgorica(17-09-2012)
6
3
2
0
| Auroux | Stats | Stevanovic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (6-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 440 |
| 241 | Highest Rank | 145 |
| 36 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 14 |
| 64% (212-121) | Career Total W/L | 58% (425-305) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $214,013 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Auroux VS Stevanovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-0 ret. | |||||
Auroux VS Stevanovic H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 8 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mailen Auroux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 1-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | def. | H2H | |||
view more
Natalija Stevanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
1 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Federica Urgesi
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Noemi Basiletti
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Francesca Curmi
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Jaeda Daniel
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Sinja Kraus
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (212/121) | Win/Loss | 58% (425/305) |
| 63% (478/286) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (930/713) |
| 56% (3828/2994) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7816/6961) |
| 57% (35/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (124/99) |
| 65% (176/93) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (252/161) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (28/31) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (21/14) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1 | Aces Total | 652 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 1950 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:1:34 |
| 567.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.42 |
| 62% (209/335) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17643/29506) |
| 56% (118/209) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (10837/17643) |
| 45% (57/126) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5247/11863) |
| 59% (19/32) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1854/3815) |
| 46% (139/305) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13600/29128) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40% (10/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 35% (15/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (79/77) | Challenger W/L | 54% (200/171) |
| 76% (133/41) | Futures W/L | 69% (199/88) |
| 64% (210/330) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (415/708) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 50% (26/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (76/129) |
| 45% (45/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (110/195) |
| 87% (213/185) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (409/365) |
| 13% (213/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (409/44) |
| 23% (119/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (319/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
